To start with, i concerned about the partnership anywhere between sexting reasons, behavior and you will expectancies

To start with, i concerned about the partnership anywhere between sexting reasons, behavior and you will expectancies

Initial analytical analyses was indeed achieved having fun with detailed analytics eg the latest reliability of your own tips, imply results and proportions.

To determine hence subscale are going to be within the regression studies, a correlation anywhere between every dimensions out of sexting and its subscales is presented. One significantly associated sext span subscale are as part of the regression to decide if it forecasts the newest subscales of one’s sexting inspiration questionnaire (Intimate motives, Body Visualize Reinforcement, Instrumental/Enraged Causes) and sexting conclusion.

Secondly, i held linear regression amongst the Social network Dependency and you can sexting issue to test our very own hypothesis, consistent with the books [11,forty-five,46,47], that a higher level off habits predicted a top deeper inclination to sext.

In the end, doing brand new design and be certain that in case the behavioural/mental troubles additionally the defensive method got a job for the sexting, i conducted separate linear regressions between your internalizing/externalizing subscales away from Young people/Mature Thinking Declaration, Grounds step one and you can Grounds dos out-of REM-71 and you will SBQ, SMQ, Sq. Brand new analyses had been used having fun with SPSS app (Type 21.0, IBM, Armonk, New york, USA).

step 3.step one. Sexting Motives, Behavior and you can Expectancy

As regards the descriptive analyses concerning sexting motivations and sexting behavior, males have a higher score in almost all sexting dimensions except sexual purposes in which females have a slightly higher score (Table 1). However, conducting several ANOVAs we found that the only significantly different dimension is that of sexting behaviors where males have a higher score (SBQ score: female M = 33.8; male M = 36.5, p < 0.05,>

In addition, ANOVAs were conducted between males and females on sexting expectations. The results show a significance for two subscales of the Sexpectancies Questionnaire: negative expectations about sending sexts ( p < 0.001,>

The correlation vackra rumänska kvinnor analyses between the SMQ, SBQ and SQ have shown the results summarized in Table 2. Briefly, positive expectations of sending are strongly related to all dimensions of sexting, motivational and behavioral (respectively: p < 0.001>

Consistent with the study of Currin , we conducted regressions between SMQ, SBQ as regressors and SQ as a predictor. The detailed results in Table 3 show that sexting behavior is predicted only by positive expectations of sending ( p < 0.001,>

The check for multicollinearity in every regression in the present paper was conducted by examining the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF). Conventionally, as suggested by Cohen and O’Brien , VIF values greater than 4–10 generally indicate severe multicollinearity. Our results are VIF < 3,>

step three.2. Social networking Dependency and you may Sexting

Off research on social network habits (female: Meters = 14.0 and you can DS = 5.59; male: Meters = several.8 and you may DS = 5.10), the new ANOVA between males and females did not tell you any mathematically significant difference between the two teams.

To put it briefly, it is possible to say that a higher level from public media dependency can lead to alot more desire to sext and you may participate more frequently within the sexting decisions.

step 3.step 3. Internalizing/Externalizing Problems, Defensive Strategy and you can Sexting

As regards the descriptive analyses on Youth/Adult Self Report and REM-71, the only statistically significant differences between males and females are given below. It emerges that females have higher levels in internalizing scales on youth/adult self-report ( p < 0.001,>

Secondly, we wanted to test our hypothesis that immature defensive strategies correlated with a more problematic type of sexting, such as instrumental/aggravated or body image reinforcement. To do this, we considered the two factors of REM-71 in correlation to each dimension of sexting motivations and behaviors. Correlation analysis found no significant relationship between sexting and factors 1 and 2 of REM-71. For this reason, from an exploratory perspective, we decided to investigate the individual subscales of REM-71, maintaining a more conservative p -value ( p < 0.01).>

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *